"People
get ready, there's a train a comin'…
All
you need is faith to hear the diesels hummin'…"
Curtis Mayfield and the Impressions
Rowan has been blessed by the transit gods. In as soon as 5 years Rowan's very own transit station will be dropped from transit heaven onto campus and land on the railroad tracks between t parking lot A and Triad. This is a once in a century opportunity and a major windfall for Rowan. It has the potential to enhance our campus in a manner worthy of the Rowan that we have the potential to become in the coming decades. But we will only get this opportunity once and we therefore have one best shot to design the station and the land around it right. The Rowan station should be the heart of a campus academic transit village that is a model of sustainable campus design.
But will
Rowan's new Business and Engineering buildings currently under design be
properly integrated with the coming rail station or will they disregard the
importance of what's coming down the tracks and squander the opportunity that
such a rail stop can bring? So far the
evidence points to the latter. Sadly,
there has been no serious dialog regarding a transit-oriented land use plan for
the new business and engineering buildings.
Trains and Universities – perfect together
When service
begins for the Glassboro-Camden Line in 2019, Rowan will be joining the other prominent New Jersey
universities such as Princeton, Rutgers and Montclair who have their own
transit stops. But unlike these other
institutions that have leveraged their own transit stops into major focal
assets of their campus, Rowan has not embraced this windfall in any substantive
way in the planning of the new buildings.
And down the line, the impact of the light rail will have far longer
implications for the future of the University and the region than the building
of these two buildings.
The
Glassboro-Camden light rail line will connect the Gloucester County's top two
employers (Underwood Hospital and Rowan University) with the core of Gloucester
County's population as well as with the greater metropolitan region. The benefits of the line will be
transformative. Not only are Underwood
and Rowan destinations for employees, perhaps more importantly, they are major
destinations for the public to access medical care and higher education. The G-C Line will offer a very viable
alternative for automobile travel through the heart of the county and will
connect the county’s core communities to Philly, NYC and the entire northeast
corridor.
The
Driveshaft of the Economic Engine
If Rowan
lives up to President's Houshmand's vision for the university to be one of the
main "economic engines" of South Jersey in the coming century then
the light rail line should be thought of as the economic "driveshaft." The majority of economic development that
will take place in Gloucester County in the next 50 years is likely to occur
along the G-C corridor. But when an
engine’s linkage to a driveshaft is weak, the ability for the vehicle to carry
a load or travel at a rapid speed will be significantly reduced. The coming Rowan transit stop and the
surrounding land use will be our link which will determine how strong and how
rapidly Rowan can help drive the South Jersey economy.
Transit
Oriented Development
So what does
it mean to have a strong land use link to a transit system? Over the past
couple of decades there has been a major trend toward transit oriented
development (TOD) across the country.
TOD is land use intentionally designed to maximize the potential of what
can be reasonably walked to from a station.
The walkable radius becomes the "golden zone" where multiple
destinations should be placed. In order
to maximize efficiency in the golden zone,TOD land use design incorporates
mixed-uses, high-density land use, pedestrian-friendly infrastructure and a
land use design that creates a "sense of place" or a "transit
village."
The golden pedestrian zone (from 1,500 to 2,500 feet radius around a transit station) is the critical real estate in which a transit village can be functional. People will only use public transportation if it provides a viable means of reaching their intended destination. If you can't walk from where the train drops you off to where you want to go, then you are not likely to choose that mode of transportation. If people have to make a connection to a second link in travel in order to reach their destination such as a shuttle bus, taxi, or another train, ridership drops by more than half for each subsequent connection.
Therefore the number and variety of destinations that are built within the walkable golden zone is a critical factor in determining how viable the transit system will be. It follows that every square inch of the golden zone around the train station should be seen as sacred ground. It is a gift from the transit gods and should be designed to be used to its maximum potential.
Many studies
have documented the benefits of Transit Oriented Development some of which include:
·
Reduced auto vehicle miles traveled and
increases walking and biking activity
·
Provision of transportation choices
·
Reduced traffic congestion, air pollution and
GHG emissions
·
Spurring of economic development and
redevelopment
·
Reduction of infrastructure and operations costs
·
Assists in conserving resource lands and open
space
·
Creates a smaller environmental footprint
Transit
Village Designation
In New
Jersey we've expanded the concept of TOD into the Transit Village program.
Transit Village designation is granted by the NJ Department of Transportation to towns that demonstrate "a commitment to revitalizing and
redeveloping the area around their transit facilities into compact, mixed-use
neighborhoods with a strong residential component."
In order to
receive Transit Village designation, a municipality must adopt a transit-oriented
development (TOD/ redevelopment plan that includes transit-supportive site
design guidelines, architectural design guidelines and transit-supportive
parking guidelines. Other criteria
include "place-making" efforts near train stations.
Communities
that qualify for Transit Village designation receive substantial benefits
including:
·
Committed support from the state Transit Village
Task Force
·
Coordination among state agencies to support
development plans around the station
·
Priority funding from some state agencies
·
Technical assistance from some state agencies
·
Eligibility for grants from the NJ Department of
Transportation (NJDOT)
To date, New
Jersey has 28 designated transit villages.
One notable example with which many Rowan employees will be familiar is
Collingswood. The Borough of
Collingswood has worked with the Delaware River Port Authority who runs the
PATCO High Speed Line to create a Transit Village Plan for the area around the
Collingswood station. One phase of the
plan transforms the large surface parking lots into structured parking and
mixed use development. The Collingswood plan gives just one visual of how we
might design the land around our pending Rowan station stop to take maximum
advantage of the golden zone.
Aerial image of Collingswood's PATCO station and currently existing surface parking. |
Collingswood's Transit Village plan for the site (Alberto Associates). |
The PATCO surface parking lots will be transformed into a vibrant mixed-use transit village with structured parking tucked behind. (rendering: Alberto Associates) |
Another
example is the Rutgers Gateway Transit Village in New Brunswick. The Gateway Transit Village entails a
compact, multi-use land use plan that directly links Rutgers to the station
with its own pedestrian bridge spanning from the campus bookstore to the train
platform. The plan won Rutgers and New
Brunswick a New Jersey Smart Growth Award in 2012. Rowan has great potential for creating an
even better campus transit village.
A
Rowan Campus Transit Village
Rowan and
Glassboro should emulate the town-gown approach of Rutgers and New Brunswick to
developing an academic Transit Village plan for the western flank of the Glassboro campus. This would entail much more than simply building a
train platform to get off and on. A Rowan Campus Transit Village would
carefully plan and design the land use around the station to maximize its
potential for benefiting Rowan as well as Rowan's potential for benefiting
the rail line. A campus transit village
would create a grand gateway experience for people arriving at our university.
Parking Lot A –The Perfect Transit
Village Real Estate
Fortunately much of the land around the proposed Rowan station stop has great potential for developing into a transit village. Parking Lot A is currently a sea of surface parking - the lowest level of land use
and the easiest to develop. Land with
surface parking has already been environmentally degraded. A parking lot is already impervious surface preventing ground aquifers to be recharged.
A parking lot already had its trees cut down and topsoil sterilized. So surface parking can be developed with
virtually no increased environmental impact than has already occurred. In fact development of surface parking
presents an opportunity to improve the environmental performance of a site since a building
can be designed with green roofs, environmental infrastructure and landscaping amenities that can improve water
quality and provide habitat.
Parking Lot
A and the parking lots around Triad present the ideal canvas for creating a
university academic transit village land use design right in the heart of that golden 5 minute walk
zone. But it's important to get the
ingredients right. The golden transit
zone must be developed at a level of intensity and design detail to achieve a
critical mass of uses and activities.
This means having as much built activity space as is reasonably possible
(within an acceptable balance appropriate for the community- more on this in
the next post).
Missing
the Train
To date
Rowan has not had any serious dialog about planning for the coming train. In spite of repeated attempts to bring the
topic up in public forums as well as in conversations with administrative
officials, there has only been platitudes and head nodding without any
substantial consideration for how to coordinate the campus master planning with
the coming light rail system. Granted that the administration has many other priorities to worry about and the rail is at least 5 years from opening.
But the consideration of the rail connection has direct implications the administrations top priorities of the business and engineering building because they will be consuming
significant chunks of land in the golden zone.
If the business building is built in a manner that locks in a myopic
land use pattern that wastes the real estate of Parking Lot A, we will have a
significantly reduced capability of creating a viable campus transit
village.
Of course its
difficult to know what actually is being planned. The bit that trickles out from the administration
seems to change every couple of weeks. Few
outside of the inner circle actually know what is being planned since there has
been very little public disclosure to date of the design process and siting of
the new buildings. While I applaud
President Houshmand’s public statements of shared governance and open process
and his offer to give up his personal parking space if there is a parking
problem, I am disappointed that there was no substantive information given
about any details of these major building projects.
And frankly
I am skeptical that there will be no parking problems involved with
simultaneously closing two of Rowan’s largest parking lots next year. From a planner's perspective, closing one let alone two major parking lots is a substantial logistical challenge
and will require a major cultural shift that is bound to have many devils in the details and
unforeseen consequences. I much rather would have the president say that he will make the parking study publicly available to review than to park in the president’s reserved
lot. (I do, after all ride a bike on most days).
I conclude
this post with the following suggested action points which I’ll dig into in
greater detail in subsequent posts. I
welcome your posted feedback.
- Rowan should develop a plan for a campus Transit Village in the area of the pending train station BEFORE the business and engineering building designs and their locations are locked into place (stay tuned for some examples of Transit Village concept plans created by our planning students this past semester).
- Rowan should work with Glassboro in attaining Transit Village designation from the NJ DOT.
- Rowan should leverage the Transit Village status to assist in campus development actives.
- Rowan should develop the Transit Village plan to qualify for LEED for Neighborhood Development certification.
- Rowan should open up a serious and meaningful channel for shared governance for campus master planning as stipulated in the Sasaki Master Plan.
- Rowan should provide any and all consultant’s reports regarding master planning and building activities to the university senate with an opportunity to weigh in before decisions are made.
- Specifically – Rowan should provide the consultant’s report regarding the parking reconfiguration plan and associated impacts of developing the business and engineering buildings on Lots A and M.
- Rowan should seriously consider moving the location of the new Business Building from Parking Lot A to the site of Linden Hall so that Parking Lot A can remain functional until it can be properly planned as the heart of a Rowan Campus Transit Village.